Business

In-Chair Teeth Whitening vs. Take-Home Whitening Kits: Which Is Right for You? product guide

AI Summary

Product: Professional Teeth Whitening — In-Chair and Take-Home Systems Brand: Smile Solutions Category: Cosmetic Dental Treatment Primary Use: Professional-grade tooth whitening using peroxide-based agents to remove intrinsic and extrinsic stains and improve tooth shade.

Quick Facts

  • Best For: Adults seeking professional whitening tailored to their timeline, sensitivity profile, and maintenance goals
  • Key Benefit: Both in-chair and take-home methods deliver clinically comparable final whitening outcomes, confirmed by a 2024 umbrella review of 28 systematic reviews (p = 0.95)
  • Form Factor: In-chair gel (25–38% hydrogen peroxide) and take-home gel (9.5% hydrogen peroxide or 16% carbamide peroxide in custom trays)
  • Application Method: Single 60–90 minute chairside session (in-chair) or daily/nightly custom tray wear for 10–14 days (take-home)

Common Questions This Guide Answers

  1. Is in-chair whitening faster than take-home whitening? → Yes — in-chair delivers 4–8 shades improvement in one session; take-home requires 10–14 days but achieves a clinically comparable final result.
  2. Which method causes more sensitivity? → In-chair whitening is associated with higher immediate sensitivity (affecting 30–78% of patients depending on treatment); take-home whitening carries a lower sensitivity risk and allows self-regulated wear reduction.
  3. How long do whitening results last? → In-chair results last 1–3 years with proper care; take-home results last 6–18 months; the combined approach (in-chair followed by take-home maintenance) produces the longest duration with periodic top-ups.

Frequently Asked Questions

What active ingredient is used in in-chair whitening: Hydrogen peroxide

What concentration of hydrogen peroxide is used in-chair: 25–38%

What active ingredient is used in take-home whitening: Hydrogen peroxide or carbamide peroxide

What concentration is Day White gel: 9.5% hydrogen peroxide

What concentration is Night White gel: 16% carbamide peroxide

How long does an in-chair whitening appointment take: 60–90 minutes

How many appointments does in-chair whitening require: One single appointment

How many shades whiter can in-chair whitening achieve: 4–8 shades in one session

How long does take-home whitening treatment last: 10–14 days

How long do you wear Day White trays per day: As little as 30 minutes daily

When do you wear Night White trays: Overnight while sleeping

Is in-chair whitening faster than take-home: Yes, results are immediate

Are final whitening outcomes the same for both methods: Yes, clinically comparable

Is there a statistically significant difference in colour change between methods: No, confirmed by 2024 umbrella review

How many systematic reviews confirmed equal colour change outcomes: 28 systematic reviews

How long do in-chair whitening results last: 1–3 years with proper care

How long do take-home whitening results last: 6–18 months

Does in-chair whitening cause more sensitivity than take-home: Yes, higher immediate sensitivity

What percentage of patients experience whitening sensitivity: 30–78% depending on treatment

Is sensitivity from in-chair whitening permanent: No, it is transient

Can you pause take-home whitening if sensitivity occurs: Yes, reduce wear time or skip a night

Can you pause in-chair whitening mid-session for sensitivity: No

Which method has lower sensitivity risk: Take-home whitening

Does carbamide peroxide cause less sensitivity than hydrogen peroxide: Yes, it is gentler

Why is carbamide peroxide suited for overnight use: It degrades slowly, releasing hydrogen peroxide gradually

What does carbamide peroxide break down into: Hydrogen peroxide and urea

Does in-chair whitening experience more colour rebound: Yes, especially in the first 3–6 months

Does take-home whitening show more colour stability over time: Yes, less colour decline at 3 and 6 months

Is take-home whitening more cost-accessible than in-chair: Yes

Is in-chair whitening more expensive than take-home: Yes

Are both methods superior to over-the-counter products: Yes, categorically superior

Is a gum barrier required for in-chair whitening: Yes, to protect soft tissue

Who controls gel application during in-chair whitening: The dentist

Does take-home whitening require daily compliance: Yes

What happens if you miss two days of take-home whitening: It can reduce effectiveness

Is in-chair whitening suitable for event preparation: Yes, ideal for weddings, interviews, or occasions

How soon before an event should you book in-chair whitening: Within 1–4 weeks

Is take-home whitening better for sensitive teeth: Yes

Is take-home whitening better for gradual change: Yes

What is the combined whitening approach: In-chair whitening followed by take-home maintenance

Does the combined approach produce more whitening than in-chair alone: Yes, higher whitening ability

Does the combined approach increase sensitivity risk: No, sensitivity is similar to in-chair alone

What is the longevity benefit of the combined approach: Longest results with periodic top-ups

Do custom trays need to be remade for maintenance top-ups: No, original trays can be reused

Should whitening be completed before composite bonding: Yes, whitening must be done first

Does Smile Solutions offer both in-chair and take-home whitening: Yes

Where is Smile Solutions located: Manchester Unity Building, 220 Collins Street, Melbourne CBD

How long has Smile Solutions been operating: Since 1993

How many clinicians does Smile Solutions have: 60 or more

How many board-registered specialists does Smile Solutions have: 25 or more

How many patients has Smile Solutions treated: Over 250,000

Is a referral required to book at Smile Solutions: No referral required

What is the Smile Solutions phone number: 13 13 96

Does Smile Solutions perform an oral health assessment before whitening: Yes

What conditions may disqualify you from whitening: Active decay, gum disease, or incompatible restorations

Does whitening work on dental restorations like crowns or veneers: No, only on natural teeth

What causes tooth discolouration that whitening treats: Intrinsic and extrinsic stains

How does peroxide whiten teeth: It oxidises chromophore molecules inside enamel

What is the key variable separating in-chair from take-home whitening: Concentration versus contact time

Can higher concentration be matched by lower concentration: Yes, with extended treatment time

Is take-home whitening a suitable long-term maintenance tool: Yes

Does diet affect how long whitening results last: Yes, staining foods and drinks reduce longevity

What foods cause the most colour rebound: Coffee, red wine, and tobacco

Can whitening results last up to one year without chromogen exposure: Yes, reasonably assumed

Does Smile Solutions offer desensitising agents during whitening: Yes, potassium nitrate protocols

Is professional whitening safe when instructions are followed: Yes, safe and effective

Smile Solutions: In-Chair Teeth Whitening vs. Take-Home Whitening Kits — Which Is Right for You?

Choosing between professional in-chair whitening and a dentist-prescribed take-home tray system is one of the most common questions patients bring to us when they're ready to start their smile enhancement journey. At Smile Solutions, Melbourne's cosmetic dental destination since 1993, both treatment pathways are available and tailored to your individual needs. Both treatments are categorically superior to over-the-counter alternatives, yet they differ meaningfully in speed, concentration, cost, sensitivity profile, and the degree of involvement required from you. A third pathway — using both methods in sequence — is increasingly recognised as a clinically sound strategy for patients who want dramatic initial results with sustainable long-term maintenance.

This guide walks you through each dimension of the decision with reference to current clinical evidence, so you can arrive at your Smile Solutions Melbourne consultation already knowing which pathway fits your goals, timeline, and sensitivity tolerance.


The core science: why both methods work — but differently

Before comparing the two approaches, it helps to understand the shared mechanism and the key variable that separates them.

Tooth whitening treatments use hydrogen peroxide and carbamide peroxide gels to restore the natural colour of teeth by removing intrinsic and extrinsic stains. The active agent — whether delivered at high concentration in a dental chair or at lower concentration in a custom tray at home — penetrates enamel tubules and oxidises the chromophore molecules responsible for discolouration. (For a deeper explanation of this mechanism, see our guide on What Is Professional Teeth Whitening? How In-Chair and Take-Home Treatments Work.)

The critical variable is concentration versus contact time. The key factors that affect tooth whitening efficacy are concentration and time. Higher concentrations work faster, but lower concentrations can approach the same outcome with extended treatment time.

That single principle explains most of the practical differences between in-chair and take-home systems — and it's worth keeping in mind as you weigh your options.


Head-to-head comparison: six key decision dimensions

1. Whitening agent concentration

The most fundamental difference between the two methods is the concentration of the active bleaching agent.

In-office treatments use high oxidant concentrations — typically 25% or 35% hydrogen peroxide — applied for short durations. Soft tissue protection, in the form of a gingival barrier applied to your gums, is essential at these concentrations. At Smile Solutions Melbourne, the in-chair process follows this protocol precisely, with your dentist controlling every aspect of gel application to ensure both safety and even coverage.

Take-home systems use significantly lower concentrations delivered over a longer period — carbamide peroxide at 10–16% for anywhere from two to eight hours per day. Smile Solutions offers both Day White (9.5% hydrogen peroxide) and Night White (16% carbamide peroxide) to suit different schedules and sensitivity profiles. Day White can be worn for as little as 30 minutes a day over 10–14 days, while Night White uses carbamide peroxide — gentler on sensitive teeth — worn overnight for the same period.

A note on carbamide peroxide: it's a stable compound that breaks down into hydrogen peroxide and urea when it contacts water. That slow degradation is the point — it releases active hydrogen peroxide gradually throughout the treatment window, which is exactly why it works so well overnight. You're getting a prolonged whitening process while you sleep, rather than a short, intense burst.


2. Speed of results

This is where in-chair whitening holds its clearest advantage.

The entire in-chair procedure takes 60–90 minutes in a single visit, often delivering 4–8 shades of improvement. That makes it the obvious choice for patients preparing for a specific event — a wedding, a job interview, a milestone occasion — where there's no time for a gradual course of treatment.

Take-home systems require 10–14 days of consistent daily or nightly wear before the full result is visible. Shade change is more gradual, but the final brightness is often comparable — and that's a clinically significant finding. The endpoint may be similar; the timeline is very different.

A 2014 split-mouth randomised controlled trial from the University of Florence compared 10% carbamide peroxide (at-home) against 38% hydrogen peroxide (in-office) over a 14-day bleaching period with a nine-month follow-up. The researchers found no statistically significant difference in the whiteness index value between the two techniques throughout the entire follow-up period. Both produced satisfactory and long-lasting bleaching results.

That finding is corroborated by a 2024 umbrella review published in PMC that analysed 28 systematic reviews: there is no difference between in-office and at-home techniques in terms of colour change (p = 0.95) and post-treatment sensitivity (p = 0.85).

The takeaway: in-chair whitening wins on speed; take-home whitening can match it on final outcome if you commit to the full course.


3. Sensitivity risk

Sensitivity is the most common concern patients raise before committing to whitening. (For a comprehensive guide to managing this, see our article on Teeth Whitening for Sensitive Teeth: How to Minimise Discomfort Before, During and After Treatment.)

Sensitivity during whitening is quite common, affecting anywhere from 30% to over 78% of patients depending on the treatment specifics.

The clinical evidence on comparative sensitivity is worth reading carefully. While the umbrella review found no statistically significant difference in post-treatment sensitivity overall, a separate 2-year double-blind randomised clinical trial found a different picture in practice: in-office whitening recorded higher sensitivity than home bleaching (p < 0.05), along with greater colour rebound. The authors concluded that dentists must inform their patients about the expected outcomes of each procedure and provide an evidence-based choice.

The reason is straightforward: higher peroxide concentrations produce more immediate sensitivity. An increase in tooth sensitivity was observed with the in-office technique immediately after treatment, regardless of light irradiation.

If you have pre-existing sensitivity, thin enamel, or exposed dentinal tubules, a take-home approach using lower-concentration carbamide peroxide will generally serve you better. You can reduce wear time or skip a night if discomfort occurs — a degree of self-regulation that simply isn't possible during an in-chair session.

When manufacturer's instructions are followed, hydrogen peroxide and carbamide peroxide-based whitening is safe and effective. Under professional supervision at Smile Solutions, both methods are managed with patient comfort protocols — including potassium nitrate desensitising agents — that substantially reduce sensitivity risk throughout the process.


4. Longevity of results

How long your results last is central to assessing the real value of each treatment pathway.

Professional in-office whitening, performed with high-concentration bleaching agents, can keep teeth bright for one to three years with proper care.

Take-home kits deliver a different longevity profile — typically 6–18 months for the initial course. The practical advantage is that if you keep your trays, occasional maintenance nights can extend your results considerably beyond that window.

One nuance worth knowing: the 2-year double-blind randomised clinical trial noted more colour decline for in-office bleaching at the 3- and 6-month marks. In-chair whitening delivers the most dramatic initial result, but it may also be more susceptible to early colour rebound — particularly if you regularly consume staining foods and drinks. That's why in-chair whitening benefits significantly from take-home maintenance to lock in and extend the result.

If your teeth aren't regularly exposed to coffee, red wine, or tobacco, it's reasonable to expect whitened teeth to persist for up to a year. Patients who actively manage their diet and maintain regular hygiene appointments consistently see results at the longer end of the range. (For a full maintenance framework, see our guide on How Long Does Teeth Whitening Last? Results, Maintenance & Top-Up Strategies.)


5. Cost

Cost is a practical reality for most patients. While specific pricing varies by clinic, technology, and number of sessions required, the general hierarchy is consistent across Melbourne dental practices.

In-chair whitening commands a higher fee than take-home kits — the clinical time, specialist involvement, and higher-grade materials all contribute to that. Take-home kits are a more cost-accessible solution with fewer reported side effects. Dentist-prescribed take-home kits sit in a meaningful middle ground: significantly more effective than pharmacy alternatives, but more accessible in price than a full in-chair session.

For Melbourne-specific pricing and a breakdown of the factors that influence cost — including LED versus laser technology, clinic location, and number of sessions — see our dedicated guide: How Much Does Teeth Whitening Cost in Melbourne? In-Chair and Take-Home Pricing Explained.


6. Convenience and lifestyle fit

Take-home kits fit into your own schedule, which is particularly appealing if your days are busy. Night White carbamide peroxide gel is designed for overnight wear, meaning your treatment happens while you sleep — no interruption to your working day required.

In-chair whitening requires a single dedicated appointment of approximately 60–90 minutes at our Melbourne CBD clinic in the heritage Manchester Unity Building. For patients who can't commit to 10–14 consecutive nights of tray wear, or who have struggled with compliance before, the single-session approach removes the discipline variable entirely.

Like exercising at home, home whitening requires genuine motivation. Missing even two days of application can reduce effectiveness. Your Smile Solutions dentist will walk you through what to expect and help you choose the approach that actually suits your life.


The combined approach: a third pathway worth considering

Beyond the binary choice of in-chair versus take-home, there's a third — and increasingly recommended — pathway: using both methods in strategic sequence.

Many dental professionals recommend in-chair whitening for immediate results, followed by custom take-home trays for maintenance. You get the dramatic initial improvement and the easy, affordable long-term upkeep.

The clinical evidence supports this. A 2004 study published in the Journal of the American Dental Association by Deliperi, Bardwell, and Papathanasiou at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine evaluated a combined protocol using 35–38% hydrogen peroxide in-chair followed by 10% carbamide peroxide at-home maintenance. When combined with 10% carbamide peroxide at-home applications, use of the in-office bleaching materials resulted in significant tooth lightening.

A 2023 randomised controlled clinical trial published in the Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (Takamizawa et al.) examined dual whitening using 35% hydrogen peroxide in-chair and 6% hydrogen peroxide prefilled trays at home. Although dual whitening had higher whitening ability than in-office whitening alone, the intensity and absolute risk of tooth sensitivity was similar.

The practical value of the combined approach isn't just a greater shade change — it's longevity. Take-home trays used as periodic maintenance top-ups after an initial in-chair session can extend your results well beyond the 1–3 year benchmark for in-chair whitening alone. Patients at Smile Solutions who invest in custom trays at the time of their in-chair appointment can perform low-cost maintenance top-ups at home for years without needing new tray fabrication — a genuinely smart long-term investment in your smile.


Quick-reference comparison table

Factor In-Chair Whitening Take-Home Whitening Combined Approach
Agent concentration 25–38% HP 9.5–16% HP/CP Both
Speed of results Immediate (60–90 min) 10–14 days Immediate + maintained
Shade change 4–8 shades in one session Comparable over time Maximum outcome
Sensitivity risk Higher (immediate, transient) Lower (gradual, controllable) Moderate, manageable
Longevity 1–3 years 6–18 months Longest with top-ups
Cost Higher More accessible Mid-to-high investment
Convenience Single appointment Daily compliance required Best of both
Best for Event preparation, fast results Sensitive teeth, gradual change Optimal outcomes, long-term value

Who should choose in-chair whitening?

In-chair whitening at Smile Solutions Melbourne is the right choice if you:

  • Have a specific event or deadline (wedding, interview, reunion) within 1–4 weeks
  • Prefer a single-appointment solution with no daily compliance requirements
  • Have moderate-to-heavy extrinsic staining from coffee, tea, red wine, or tobacco
  • Have previously completed take-home whitening and want a dramatic reset
  • Are combining whitening with composite bonding and need a defined, stable shade before resin shade-matching (see our guide on Whitening Before Bonding: Why the Sequence Matters)

Who should choose take-home whitening?

A dentist-prescribed take-home tray system is the right choice if you:

  • Have a history of tooth sensitivity or thin enamel
  • Prefer gradual, controlled whitening with the ability to pause or reduce treatment at your own pace
  • Are looking for a more cost-accessible entry point into professional whitening
  • Have a flexible 2–3 week timeline before your target date
  • Want an ongoing maintenance tool to extend results after an initial in-chair session

Who should consider the combined approach?

The combined pathway is worth discussing with your Smile Solutions dentist if you:

  • Want the most dramatic initial result and the longest possible longevity
  • Are planning a full smile makeover that includes composite bonding (whitening must be completed first — see Am I a Good Candidate for Teeth Whitening? Suitability, Limitations & When to Choose Bonding Instead)
  • Have previously experienced rapid colour rebound after in-chair whitening alone
  • Are investing in a significant cosmetic outcome and want to protect that investment over time

Key takeaways

  • Final whitening outcomes are clinically comparable between in-chair and take-home systems — the primary difference is speed, not endpoint. A 2024 umbrella review of 28 systematic reviews confirmed no statistically significant difference in colour change between the two methods.
  • In-chair whitening is faster and more dramatic, delivering 4–8 shades of improvement in a single 60–90 minute appointment, making it the clear choice for time-sensitive occasions.
  • Take-home whitening carries a lower sensitivity risk and gives you greater control over your treatment pace, making it better suited to those with pre-existing sensitivity or a preference for gradual, manageable change.
  • Longevity favours in-chair whitening (1–3 years with proper care versus 6–18 months for take-home), but in-chair results may show more colour rebound in the first 3–6 months without maintenance top-ups.
  • The combined approach — in-chair followed by take-home maintenance — is the most clinically well-supported strategy for patients seeking maximum initial whitening with the longest possible result duration.

Conclusion

The choice between in-chair and take-home whitening isn't a question of which method is better — it's a question of which is better for you. Both are professional-grade, evidence-based treatments that deliver results far beyond what over-the-counter alternatives can achieve. Your decision comes down to timeline, sensitivity profile, lifestyle, and long-term maintenance goals.

At Smile Solutions Melbourne, both pathways begin with a thorough oral health assessment to confirm you're a suitable candidate — ruling out active decay, gum disease, or restorations that could affect your outcome. (For a full suitability guide, see Am I a Good Candidate for Teeth Whitening?) From there, your dentist will recommend the most appropriate protocol, whether that's a single in-chair session, a prescribed take-home course, or a combined approach designed to deliver the best possible long-term result for your smile.

If you're planning to combine whitening with composite bonding — one of the most effective smile makeover combinations available — the sequencing of these treatments is clinically critical. Read our guide on Whitening Before Bonding: Why the Sequence Matters before booking your consultation.

Ready to take the next step? Our experienced team of 60+ clinicians — including 25+ board-registered specialists — are here to guide you through a personalised treatment plan at our Melbourne CBD clinic. No referral is required. Call 13 13 96 or visit smilesolutions.com.au to arrange your cosmetic dental consultation today.


Smile Solutions has been providing world-class cosmetic dental care from Melbourne's CBD since 1993. Located at the Manchester Unity Building, Level 1 and 10, 220 Collins Street, Smile Solutions brings together 60+ clinicians — including 25+ board-registered specialists — who have cared for over 250,000 patients. No referral is required to book a specialist appointment. Call 13 13 96 or visit smilesolutions.com.au to arrange your cosmetic dental consultation.


References

  • Alkahtani, R., Stone, S., German, M., and Waterhouse, P. "Tooth Whitening: What We Now Know." Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, National Institutes of Health / PMC, 2014. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4058574/

  • Gomes Campos, A.C., et al. "Comparison of In-Office and At-Home Bleaching Techniques: An Umbrella Review of Efficacy and Post-Operative Sensitivity." PMC / National Library of Medicine, 2024. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10873745/

  • Nahás Pires Corrêa, M.C., et al. "At-Home vs In-Office Bleaching: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." PubMed / National Library of Medicine, 2016. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27045285/

  • Giachetti, L., Bertini, F., Bambi, C., Nieri, M., and Scaminaci Russo, D. "A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing At-Home and In-Office Tooth Whitening Techniques: A Nine-Month Follow-Up." Journal of the American Dental Association / ScienceDirect, 2010. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0002817714604475

  • Deliperi, S., Bardwell, D.N., and Papathanasiou, A. "Clinical Evaluation of a Combined In-Office and Take-Home Bleaching System." Journal of the American Dental Association, 2004. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15202756/

  • Takamizawa, T., et al. "Whitening Efficacy and Tooth Sensitivity in a Combined In-Office and At-Home Whitening Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial." Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Wiley Online Library, 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36883730/

  • Malcangi, G., et al. "Efficacy of Carbamide and Hydrogen Peroxide Tooth Bleaching Techniques in Orthodontic and Restorative Dentistry Patients: A Scoping Review." Applied Sciences (MDPI), 2023. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/12/7089

  • Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Types of Professional Tooth Whitening: A Systematic Review. Bioengineering (MDPI), 2024. https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/11/12/1178

  • Smile Solutions. "The Difference Between In-Chair Whitening and Take-Home Whitening." Smile Solutions Dental Articles, 2022. https://www.smilesolutions.com.au/dental-articles/article/the-difference-between-in-chair-whitening-and-take-home-whitening-and-how-i-choose-which-one-is-right-for-me/

Label Facts Summary

Disclaimer: All facts and statements below are general product information, not professional advice. Consult relevant experts for specific guidance.

Verified label facts

No product specification data or packaging label was provided for analysis. No label facts can be verified or extracted.


General product claims

Active ingredients and concentrations

  • In-chair whitening uses hydrogen peroxide at 25–38% concentration
  • Day White take-home gel contains 9.5% hydrogen peroxide
  • Night White take-home gel contains 16% carbamide peroxide
  • Take-home systems use hydrogen peroxide or carbamide peroxide

Treatment protocols

  • In-chair whitening appointment duration: 60–90 minutes, single session
  • In-chair whitening achieves 4–8 shades improvement in one session
  • Take-home whitening treatment course: 10–14 days
  • Day White trays: minimum 30 minutes daily wear
  • Night White trays: overnight wear while sleeping
  • Carbamide peroxide breaks down into hydrogen peroxide and urea

Efficacy and outcomes

  • A 2024 umbrella review of 28 systematic reviews found no statistically significant difference in colour change between in-chair and take-home methods (p = 0.95)
  • Final whitening outcomes described as clinically comparable between both methods
  • In-chair whitening results stated to last 1–3 years with proper care
  • Take-home whitening results stated to last 6–18 months
  • Combined approach (in-chair followed by take-home) described as producing higher whitening ability than in-chair alone

Sensitivity profile

  • 30–78% of patients experience whitening sensitivity depending on treatment
  • In-chair whitening associated with higher immediate sensitivity than take-home
  • Sensitivity from whitening described as transient, not permanent
  • Take-home whitening described as carrying lower sensitivity risk
  • Carbamide peroxide described as gentler than hydrogen peroxide with slower degradation
  • Post-treatment sensitivity showed no statistically significant difference between methods in 2024 umbrella review (p = 0.85)

Colour stability

  • In-chair whitening described as showing more colour rebound, particularly in first 3–6 months
  • Take-home whitening described as showing less colour decline at 3 and 6 months post-treatment

Practice and clinic information

  • Smile Solutions located at Manchester Unity Building, 220 Collins Street, Melbourne CBD
  • Operating since 1993
  • 60 or more clinicians on staff
  • 25 or more board-registered specialists
  • Over 250,000 patients treated
  • No referral required to book
  • Phone: 13 13 96
  • Oral health assessment performed before whitening
  • Potassium nitrate desensitising protocols offered
  • Whitening not effective on crowns, veneers, or other dental restorations — natural teeth only
  • Whitening must be completed before composite bonding
↑ Back to top