Endodontic Surgery (Apicoectomy) in Melbourne: When Surgery Is the Answer product guide

AI Summary

Product: Apicoectomy (Endodontic Surgery / Root-End Surgery) Brand: Smile Solutions Melbourne Category: Specialist Dental Procedure — Endodontic Surgery Primary Use: Surgical removal of the root tip and surrounding infected tissue to preserve a tooth when non-surgical root canal treatment cannot resolve persistent periapical infection.

Quick facts

• Best for: Patients with persistent periapical pathology, anatomical obstructions, prosthetic complexity, separated instruments, or atypical periapical lesions requiring biopsy
• Key benefit: Modern endodontic microsurgery achieves 91–94% success rates, more than five times higher than traditional apicoectomy technique
• Form factor: Outpatient surgical procedure performed under local anaesthetic
• Application method: Microsurgical access through gum and bone; root-end resection, debridement, and retrograde filling under 12–24× magnification

Common questions this guide answers

1. When is an apicoectomy necessary instead of retreatment? → When non-surgical retreatment is not feasible or has failed due to anatomical obstruction, prosthetic complexity, or persistent periapical pathology
2. What success rate does modern apicoectomy achieve? → 91–94% with microsurgical technique, compared to 59% with traditional technique
3. What root-end filling material is used today? → Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and bioceramics such as Biodentine, replacing amalgam because of superior sealing, biocompatibility, and osteoinductive properties

Smile Solutions endodontic surgery (apicoectomy) in Melbourne: when surgery is the answer

At Smile Solutions, Melbourne's long-established specialist dental centre, our board-registered endodontists know that for most patients, root canal treatment resolves infection, eliminates pain, and preserves the natural tooth permanently. But a clinically important subset of cases — those involving persistent periapical pathology, anatomical obstacles, or prior treatment complications — cannot be resolved through the root canal alone. In these situations, endodontic surgery isn't a fallback; it's the correct, evidence-supported treatment pathway.

Apicoectomy (also called root-end surgery or periapical surgery) is the most common surgical procedure performed by specialist endodontists, and it takes a fundamentally different approach to tooth preservation than the non-surgical root canal treatment most patients are familiar with. Understanding when surgery is indicated, what the procedure involves, and what outcomes the current evidence supports matters for any patient facing this decision.

This article walks through the full clinical picture of endodontic surgery — from the specific indications that make it necessary, through the step-by-step procedure and the materials used, to the healing timeline and peer-reviewed success rates. It also clarifies the critical distinction between surgical and non-surgical endodontics, and explains why both require specialist-level expertise to achieve the best possible outcomes.

What is an apicoectomy?

Apical surgery belongs to the field of endodontic surgery, which also includes incision and drainage, closure of perforations, and root or tooth resections. The objective is to surgically maintain a tooth that has an endodontic lesion that cannot be resolved by conventional endodontic (re-)treatment.

More specifically, an apicoectomy — also known as root-end surgery — is a specialised dental procedure aimed at preserving your tooth when it hasn't responded to conventional endodontic treatments such as root canal therapy. The surgery involves removing the apex, or tip, of the tooth's root along with any surrounding infected tissue. The goal is to eliminate the source of infection and inflammation so the tooth can heal and return to full function.

The procedure addresses persistent endodontic pathogens through three steps: surgical debridement of pathological periradicular tissue, root-end resection, and retrograde root canal obturation (root-end filling).

When is endodontic surgery indicated? The clinical decision framework

The decision to proceed with surgical rather than non-surgical endodontics requires thorough diagnostic assessment. Clinical and radiographic examination of the tooth — including adjacent and opposing teeth — is essential before apical surgery to determine whether surgical or non-surgical endodontics is the right path.

Specific indications for apicoectomy

The most common indication is inflammation or infection that persists in the bony area around the end of your tooth after root canal treatment. The European Society of Endodontology's updated guidelines identify several clinical scenarios where periapical surgery is appropriate:

1. Persistent periapical pathology after non-surgical treatment: Failure of root canal therapy often presents with persistent periapical pathology or symptoms despite adequate nonsurgical treatment. Apicoectomy is frequently indicated when orthograde retreatment is not feasible or has already failed.

2. Anatomical obstructions preventing orthograde access: Endodontic surgery can locate fractures or hidden canals that don't appear on X-rays but still cause pain. Damaged root surfaces or surrounding bone may also be treated this way.

3. Prosthetic complexity preventing retreatment: When disassembling the existing restoration could leave the tooth non-restorable, surgical re-treatment may be the less invasive option — though non-surgical re-treatment is generally preferred where possible.

4. Separated instruments at or near the apex: When a fractured instrument is lodged in the apical third and cannot be retrieved orthograde, surgical access allows direct removal and root-end sealing.

5. Biopsy requirement: When a periapical lesion has atypical radiographic features suggesting a non-inflammatory cause, surgical access is necessary to obtain tissue for histopathological examination.

6. Canal calcification or root resorption at the apex: An apicoectomy is also appropriate when an obstruction or unusual root anatomy makes further root canal work impossible.

When non-surgical retreatment is preferred first

Surgery is not automatically the next step after a failed root canal. Current evidence indicates that endodontic re-treatment has higher success rates than apical surgery, and a non-surgical approach is advised when root canal treatment is initially unsuccessful. Your specialist endodontist's role is to determine which pathway — orthograde retreatment or periapical surgery — offers the better prognosis for your specific case.

(For a detailed explanation of when and why root canals fail and how non-surgical retreatment addresses these failures, see our guide on Root Canal Retreatment: When and Why a Previous Root Canal Fails and How Specialists Fix It.)

Surgical vs. non-surgical endodontics: a direct comparison

The apicoectomy procedure: step by step

Modern apicoectomy performed by a specialist endodontist is a microsurgical procedure, typically carried out under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting. It requires precision, purpose-built instruments, and strict adherence to current endodontic technique.

Step 1: Pre-operative assessment and imaging

Before the procedure, a thorough evaluation confirms that apicoectomy is the right approach. Digital X-rays or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) are used to visualise the root anatomy, surrounding bone, and any periapical pathology. CBCT is particularly useful for identifying complex root structures or hidden canals that standard X-rays may miss.

(For a detailed explanation of how CBCT imaging improves surgical planning, see our guide on Root Canal Technology at Smile Solutions: Cone Beam CT, Rotary Instrumentation, and Dental Microscopes.)

Step 2: Anaesthesia and flap design

Local anaesthesia is administered to achieve complete pain control. An incision is made in the gum tissue near the affected tooth to expose the underlying bone and root tip. The flap design is chosen to provide adequate access while minimising disruption to the periodontium and allowing primary closure.

Step 3: Osteotomy and root-end resection

The introduction of microsurgical techniques in the mid-1990s transformed apical surgery. Modern microsurgical principles include producing a small osteotomy for access to the root end, resecting the root end perpendicular to the long axis of the root, inspecting the resected root face for microstructures, and preparing a root-end microcavity — all to minimise surgical trauma and create optimal conditions for the root-end filling.

Typically, 3 mm of the root apex is resected. This removes the apical delta — the complex network of accessory canals in the terminal root tip that cannot be cleaned orthograde — and eliminates the most heavily contaminated portion of the root.

Step 4: Curettage and inspection under magnification

Using specialised instruments, the surgeon removes infected tissue and the root tip, then cleans and disinfects the area. Under the surgical operating microscope at 12–24× magnification, the resected root face is inspected for isthmi, lateral canals, cracks, and any remaining contamination invisible to the naked eye. Clinical guidelines advise using a surgical microscope for all apical surgery to benefit from both magnification and illumination.

Step 5: Root-end cavity preparation

Ultrasonic retrotips are used to prepare a root-end cavity 3 mm deep along the long axis of the root. This approach avoids the bevelled preparation of traditional techniques, which exposed dentinal tubules and increased the risk of bacterial leakage.

Step 6: Root-end filling placement

The primary goal of apical surgery is to prevent bacterial leakage from the root-canal system into the periradicular tissues by placing a tight root-end filling after root-end resection. A root-end filling is placed to seal the root against reinfection, and the gum is sutured. Bone naturally heals around the root over the following months, restoring the tooth's full function.

Step 7: Flap repositioning and suturing

The mucoperiosteal flap is repositioned and sutured with fine 5-0 or 6-0 monofilament suture material. Sutures are typically removed at your 7–10 day post-operative review.

Root-end filling materials: why MTA and bioceramics have replaced amalgam

The material used to seal the root end is a critical factor in surgical success. The shift from amalgam to modern biocompatible cements has been one of the most significant advances in endodontic surgery over the past two decades.

Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is now used extensively across vital pulp therapies, regenerative endodontic procedures, apical barriers in teeth with open apices, perforation repairs, and root-end filling during surgical endodontics. Its clinical advantages over amalgam are well-documented: superior sealing ability, biocompatibility, and osteoinductive properties that amalgam simply doesn't have.

Research with osteoblasts has confirmed cell attachment and synthesis of bone matrix on MTA surfaces — meaning the material actively stimulates bone and cementum regeneration adjacent to the filling. This biological activity is specific to calcium silicate-based materials.

MTA remains the material of choice, and more recently bioceramic root repair materials — including Biodentine and EndoSequence Root Repair Material — have shown comparable biocompatibility with improved handling characteristics.

Success rates: what the evidence shows

The evidence for modern endodontic microsurgery shows substantially better outcomes than traditional apicoectomy technique. Understanding this distinction matters when interpreting older statistics.

Traditional vs. modern microsurgical technique

Traditional root-end surgery used a bur attached to a straight handpiece, a bevelled resection, root-end preparation at an inadequate angle, and a retrograde amalgam filling. The success rate of traditional apicoectomy was reported at 59.0% (Setzer et al., 2010).

Modern microsurgery produces dramatically better results. Two meta-analyses focused on contemporary microsurgical techniques — using ultrasonic root-end preparation and modern root-end filling materials in teeth with good periodontal support — found cumulative success rates of 91.4% to 93.5% after at least one year of follow-up.

When researchers analysed results from 21 clinical trials including over 1,600 patients, 59% of patients treated with traditional root-end surgery had a positive outcome six months after the procedure (Setzer, Shah, Kohli, Karabucak & Kim, 2010). Among patients who underwent endodontic microsurgery (EMS), 94% had a positive outcome — defined as evidence of healing and the absence of pain, swelling, and sensitivity in the affected tooth.

A 5-year controlled clinical trial concluded that modern apicoectomy produced a probability of success more than five times higher than the traditional technique (odds ratio 5.20 [95% confidence interval, 3.94–6.92]; P < 0.001).

Current pooled data

The pooled periapical healed rate for studies published up to 2021 was 69% (95% CI: 65%, 73%), rising to 76% (95% CI: 66%, 86%) when only data from 2020s studies were analysed — reflecting continuing improvement as microsurgical techniques and bioceramic materials become standard practice.

A 2024 expert consensus published in the International Journal of Oral Science cites a success rate above 90% for apical microsurgery performed under optimal specialist conditions, describing it as accurate, minimally invasive, and producing few complications.

Factors that affect outcomes

The prognostic factors consistently associated with periapical healing include: pre-operative periapical lesion with complete loss of buccal plate, quality of root-end preparation, remaining thickness of apical root dentine, and restorative status.

A combined endodontic-periodontal lesion significantly reduces the prognosis. Kim et al. (2008) reported a successful outcome of 77.5% in apicoectomised teeth with combined endodontic-periodontal lesions, compared to 95.2% in teeth with isolated endodontic lesions.

Research also shows that 95–97% of cases classified as successful at the 1-year review remain so at 5 years, making the 12-month post-operative radiograph a reliable and clinically meaningful outcome milestone.

Post-operative healing: what to expect

Immediate post-operative phase (days 1–3)

Some discomfort and mild swelling while the incision heals is normal after any surgical procedure. Appropriate pain medication will be recommended to manage this. Swelling typically peaks at 48–72 hours and resolves progressively over the following week. Cold compresses applied to the face during the first 24 hours help keep swelling down, and strenuous physical activity should be avoided for 48–72 hours.

Soft tissue healing (days 7–14)

A follow-up visit is typically scheduled within 7–10 days post-surgery. Your clinician will assess soft tissue healing, remove any non-resorbable sutures, and check for signs of infection or other complications.

Bone regeneration phase (months 1–12)

Bone healing after periapical surgery is gradual. Radiographs taken at follow-up intervals monitor the progress of bone healing and the resolution of the periapical lesion. CBCT imaging may be used in complex cases for more detailed views. The bone defect fills progressively with new trabecular bone over 6–12 months, and the periapical radiolucency on radiographs gradually resolves. Reviews are typically scheduled at 6 months and 12 months post-surgery.

Key takeaways

• Apicoectomy is indicated when non-surgical treatment cannot resolve persistent periapical infection — typically because of anatomical obstruction, prosthetic complexity, or prior treatment failure that cannot be corrected orthograde.
• Modern endodontic microsurgery achieves success rates of 91–94%, compared to 59% for traditional apicoectomy, because of operating microscopes, ultrasonic root-end preparation, and biocompatible MTA/bioceramic filling materials.
• The three core steps are surgical debridement of periapical pathology, root-end resection, and retrograde root-end filling with a biocompatible material such as MTA.
• Cases classified as healed at 12 months remain healed in 95–97% of instances at 5 years, making the 1-year review a reliable predictor of long-term outcomes.
• Specialist endodontist expertise is the single most controllable determinant of outcome. The probability of success with modern microsurgery is more than five times higher than with traditional technique, and case selection, microsurgical execution, and material choice all require specialist-level training.

Conclusion

Endodontic surgery isn't a last resort — it's a precisely indicated, evidence-based treatment that resolves cases non-surgical endodontics genuinely cannot. When your clinical scenario calls for periapical surgery, the outcomes achievable with modern endodontic microsurgery are excellent: success rates above 90% in well-selected cases, minimal post-operative morbidity, and durable long-term healing confirmed by the peer-reviewed literature.

The technical demands of microsurgical endodontics are real. Operating under high magnification, using ultrasonic retrotips to prepare root-end cavities, placing biocompatible materials with precision in a confined surgical field — these require the training, equipment, and case volume that define a specialist endodontic practice.

At Smile Solutions in Melbourne, our board-registered specialist endodontists provide comprehensive care across the full scope of endodontic treatment — from primary root canal therapy through non-surgical retreatment to periapical microsurgery. The decision about which treatment pathway is right for your tooth is made after a thorough diagnostic assessment, including CBCT imaging where indicated, with a transparent explanation of the evidence behind each option.

If you're concerned about a tooth that hasn't responded to previous treatment, book a specialist consultation. No referral is required. Call 13 13 96 or visit smilesolutions.com.au to arrange your appointment with one of our specialist endodontists at our Collins Street Specialist Centre in Melbourne's CBD.

For related reading, see our guides on:

• Root Canal Retreatment: When and Why a Previous Root Canal Fails and How Specialists Fix It — for cases where non-surgical retreatment is the appropriate first step
• Root Canal Technology at Smile Solutions: Cone Beam CT, Rotary Instrumentation, and Dental Microscopes — for how our diagnostic and surgical technology supports optimal outcomes
• Root Canal Success Rates and Long-Term Outcomes: What the Clinical Evidence Shows — for a comprehensive review of outcome data across all endodontic treatment modalities
• Root Canal vs. Tooth Extraction and Implant: Which Is the Better Long-Term Choice? — for patients weighing surgical tooth preservation against extraction

Smile Solutions has been providing specialist endodontic care from Melbourne's CBD since 1993. Located at the Manchester Unity Building, Level 8, Collins Street Specialist Centre, 220 Collins Street, Smile Solutions brings together 60+ clinicians — including 25+ board-registered specialists — who have cared for over 250,000 patients. No referral is required to book a specialist appointment. Call 13 13 96 or visit smilesolutions.com.au to arrange your specialist endodontic consultation.

References

• Ng, Y.L. "Factors that influence the outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment." International Endodontic Journal, 2023. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/iej.13896

• Setzer, F.C., Shah, S.B., Kohli, M.R., Karabucak, B., Kim, S. "Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature - Part 1: Comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery." Journal of Endodontics, 36(11), 2010. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20951283/

• von Arx, T. "Apical surgery: A review of current techniques and outcome." Saudi Dental Journal, 23(1), 2011. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3770245/

• Ko, M.J., Park, J.H., Lee, N.R., Yoon, J.H., Kim, Y.T., Cho, S.Y. "Success rates comparison of endodontic microsurgery and single implants with comprehensive and explicit criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 50(1), 2025. https://rde.ac/journal/view.php?doi=10.5395/rde.2025.50.e8

• Expert Consensus Panel. "Expert consensus on apical microsurgery." International Journal of Oral Science, 2024. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41368-024-00334-8

• Torabinejad, M., Parirokh, M., Dummer, P.M.H. "Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview - part II: other clinical applications and complications." International Endodontic Journal, 2018. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/iej.12843

• Rud, J., Andreasen, J.O., Jensen, J.E.M. (referenced in von Arx, 2011). "A multivariate analysis of the influence of various factors upon healing after endodontic surgery." International Journal of Oral Surgery, 1972.

• Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). "Dental Devices and Materials." TGA Resources, 2024. https://www.tga.gov.au/

• Kim, E., Song, J.S., Jung, I.Y., Lee, S.J., Kim, S. "Prospective clinical study evaluating endodontic microsurgery outcomes for cases with lesions of endodontic origin compared with cases with lesions of combined periodontal–endodontic origin." Journal of Endodontics, 2008. (Referenced in von Arx, PMC3770245.)

• Tsesis, I., Rosen, E., Schwartz-Arad, D., Fuss, Z. "Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique." Journal of Endodontics, 2006. (Referenced in PubMed 24469371 and PMC3872851.)

Frequently asked questions

What is an apicoectomy: Surgical removal of a tooth's root tip and surrounding infected tissue

Is an apicoectomy the same as root-end surgery: Yes, they are the same procedure

Is an apicoectomy the same as periapical surgery: Yes, all three terms refer to the same procedure

What field does apicoectomy belong to: Endodontic surgery

What is the primary goal of an apicoectomy: Eliminate the source of infection and restore tooth functionality

How many core steps does an apicoectomy involve: Three core steps

What is the first core step of an apicoectomy: Surgical debridement of periapical pathology

What is the second core step of an apicoectomy: Root-end resection (apicoectomy)

What is the third core step of an apicoectomy: Retrograde root-end filling with biocompatible material

How much of the root tip is removed during apicoectomy: Approximately 3 mm

Why is 3 mm of the root apex removed: To eliminate the apical delta and most contaminated root portion

What is the apical delta: A complex network of accessory canals in the terminal root tip

Can the apical delta be cleaned non-surgically: No, it cannot be cleaned orthograde

What anaesthesia is used for apicoectomy: Local anaesthetic

Is sedation available for apicoectomy: Yes, sedation is available as an option

Is apicoectomy performed as an outpatient procedure: Yes

What imaging is used before apicoectomy: Digital X-rays or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)

What does CBCT identify that standard X-rays may miss: Complex root structures or hidden canals

What magnification is used during apicoectomy surgery: 12–24× magnification under surgical operating microscope

Are clinicians advised to use a surgical microscope for apicoectomy: Yes

What tool is used to prepare the root-end cavity: Ultrasonic retrotips

How deep is the root-end cavity prepared: 3 mm deep along the long axis of the root

What is the preferred root-end filling material today: Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)

What replaced amalgam as root-end filling material: MTA and bioceramic materials

Why is MTA superior to amalgam for root-end filling: Superior sealing ability, biocompatibility, and osteoinductive properties

Does MTA stimulate bone regeneration: Yes, it has osteoinductive properties

What newer materials are used alongside MTA: Biodentine and EndoSequence Root Repair Material

When are sutures typically removed after apicoectomy: At 7–10 days post-operative review

What suture material is typically used: 5-0 or 6-0 monofilament

When does post-operative swelling typically peak: At 48–72 hours

How long does post-operative swelling typically last: Resolves progressively over the following week

What helps minimise swelling after apicoectomy: Cold compresses applied during the first 24 hours

How long should strenuous activity be avoided after surgery: 48–72 hours

How long does bone healing take after apicoectomy: 6–12 months

When is the first follow-up visit scheduled: Within 7–10 days post-surgery

When are radiographic follow-ups typically conducted: At 6 months and 12 months post-surgery

Is the 1-year review a reliable predictor of long-term healing: Yes

What percentage of cases healed at 12 months remain healed at 5 years: 95–97%

What is the success rate of modern endodontic microsurgery: 91–94%

What was the success rate of traditional apicoectomy: 59%

How much more likely is success with modern vs traditional technique: More than 5 times more likely (odds ratio 5.20)

What is the pooled periapical healed rate from 2020s studies: 76%

What is the success rate of apicoectomy in isolated endodontic lesions: 95.2%

What is the success rate when combined endodontic-periodontal lesion is present: 77.5%

Does a combined endodontic-periodontal lesion reduce prognosis: Yes, significantly

What is the most common indication for apicoectomy: Persistent periapical pathology after root canal treatment

Can apicoectomy be used to locate hidden fractures: Yes

Can apicoectomy be used to obtain tissue for biopsy: Yes

When is biopsy via apicoectomy indicated: When periapical lesion has atypical radiographic features

Is apicoectomy indicated for separated instruments near the apex: Yes, when they cannot be retrieved orthograde

Is apicoectomy indicated for severe canal calcification: Yes

Is surgery automatically the next step after a failed root canal: No

What is generally preferred before apicoectomy: Non-surgical retreatment

Does non-surgical retreatment have higher success rates than apical surgery: Yes, according to current evidence

What access route does non-surgical root canal use: Through the tooth crown

What access route does apicoectomy use: Through the gum and bone

What is the recovery like after non-surgical root canal: Minimal post-operative discomfort

What is the recovery like after apicoectomy: Moderate swelling for 2–5 days

Who performs apicoectomy at Smile Solutions: Board-registered specialist endodontists

Where is Smile Solutions located: Level 8, 220 Collins Street, Melbourne CBD

How long has Smile Solutions provided specialist endodontic care: Since 1993

How many clinicians does Smile Solutions have: 60+ clinicians

How many board-registered specialists does Smile Solutions have: 25+ specialists

How many patients has Smile Solutions treated: Over 250,000 patients

Is a referral required to book at Smile Solutions: No referral required

What is the Smile Solutions phone number: 13 13 96

What prognostic factor most reduces apicoectomy success: Complete loss of buccal plate pre-operatively

Does restorative status affect apicoectomy outcomes: Yes, it is a reported prognostic factor

What introduced the major advance in apicoectomy technique: Microsurgical techniques introduced in the mid-1990s

Label facts summary

Disclaimer: All facts and statements below are general product information, not professional advice. Consult relevant experts for specific guidance.

Verified label facts

No product packaging data, specification table, or manufacturer label documentation was present in the content provided. The product specification data was explicitly empty ({}). Therefore, no verifiable label facts — such as ingredients, dimensions, weight, certifications, GTIN/MPN, or technical specifications — can be extracted or confirmed.

The following are procedure and practice facts verifiable from cited clinical literature and publicly stated practice information:

• Procedure name: Apicoectomy (also: root-end surgery, periapical surgery)
• Clinical field: Endodontic surgery
• Root apex resected: Approximately 3 mm
• Root-end cavity preparation depth: 3 mm along the long axis of the root
• Magnification used: 12–24× under surgical operating microscope
• Suture material: 5-0 or 6-0 monofilament
• Suture removal: 7–10 days post-operatively
• Anaesthesia: Local anaesthetic (sedation available as an option)
• Setting: Outpatient
• Imaging modalities: Digital X-rays or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)
• Root-end filling material (current standard): Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA); also Biodentine and EndoSequence Root Repair Material
• Post-operative swelling peak: 48–72 hours
• Bone healing timeline: 6–12 months
• Radiographic follow-up schedule: 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
• Practice location: Level 8, 220 Collins Street, Melbourne CBD
• Practice established: 1993
• Clinician count: 60+ clinicians
• Board-registered specialists: 25+
• Patients treated: Over 250,000
• Referral requirement: None
• Phone number: 13 13 96

General product claims

• Modern endodontic microsurgery achieves success rates of 91–94%, compared to 59% for traditional apicoectomy
• Probability of success with modern technique is more than five times higher than traditional technique (odds ratio 5.20)
• Pooled periapical healed rate from 2020s studies is 76%
• Success rate in isolated endodontic lesions: 95.2%; in combined endodontic-periodontal lesions: 77.5%
• Cases healed at 12 months remain healed in 95–97% of instances at 5 years
• MTA has superior sealing ability, biocompatibility, and osteoinductive properties compared to amalgam
• MTA stimulates bone and cementum regeneration adjacent to the filling
• Non-surgical retreatment generally has higher success rates than apical surgery and is preferred first-line where feasible
• Specialist endodontist expertise is described as the single most controllable determinant of outcome
• Modern apicoectomy is described as accurate, minimally invasive, and producing few complications
• Complete loss of buccal plate pre-operatively is the prognostic factor most reducing success
• The 1-year radiographic review is a reliable predictor of long-term durable healing